Peer review stands as a cornerstone of academic publishing, serving as the gatekeeper that ensures scholarly work meets rigorous standards of quality and integrity. Central to this process is the invaluable feedback provided by reviewers.

Submitting a research paper to a journal can be a nerve-wracking experience, filled with anticipation and uncertainty. 

Submitting a manuscript to a journal marks a critical milestone in an academic researcher's journey. However, the peer review process can be opaque, and ensuring the right experts evaluate your work is paramount. 

In the academic publishing landscape, authorship attribution stands as a cornerstone of recognition and accountability. However, amidst the complexities of collaborative research and evolving publication norms, crafting clear and equitable authorship statements can become a daunting task for even the most seasoned scholars.

Submitting a manuscript to a peer-reviewed journal is a pivotal moment for any author or researcher. However, this can be a daunting task, often accompanied by confusion and uncertainty. One of the most perplexing occurrences is when the status of a manuscript changes from "under review" to "reviewers assigned," leaving authors questioning the implications of this shift.